Surely you noticed the centrality of the notion of a product being “unreasonably dangerous,” right? And surely, Pennsylvania jury instructions must explain what that notion means, right? Wrong.
On 3 February 2025, the Bombay High Court ruled against the defendants for contempt of court in a pharmaceuticals case and imposed a cost of 500,000 rupees (approximately US$5,800) along with ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback